After an in-depth study
of the problem that has bedeviled the
Nigerian nation for about five decades
of her Nationhood, I was convinced,
beyond reasonable doubt, that the
problem of Africa’s most populous black
nation is with its leadership and not
followership. Primordially, our nation
has been bedeviled with the ascension to
power of both educated illiterates as
well as none naturally intelligent and
selfish beings at various leadership
positions.
People who do not know how to use their
political office to add value to
humanity have no business staying back
in office. Everybody must not be in
power. Power should be left for very
creative and proactive social engineers
who have a covenant with God on putting
smile, and not tears, on the faces of
the less privileged masses of the
society.
We
have three classes of rulers saddling
the affairs of governance in Nigeria
immediately after independence. Firstly
the so called LSEs’, Harvard’s’,
Howards’ and MITs’ who are economic and
financial surrogate of western hegemony,
secondly the very educated illiterate
home grown counterparts and thirdly the
very unexposed adventurers.
All
the LSEs’, MITs’, Howards’ and Harvard’s
studied economics and similar social
sciences fashioned to help secure chummy
economic policies for their masters. It
would appear that when the west is
loosing grip of their colonies, they
quickly went back to establish the so
called London school of Economics, MIT,
Howard University in Washington DC and
Harvards of this world to counter our
independence and some of our country men
and woman coalesced in it. This is what
I call neo-colonization which is several
times worse than colonization. Whereas
colonization is visible and tangible,
neo-colonization smoulds like a fire
inside of a huge tree trunk or hepatitis
inside the body a human being.
Elsewhere, leaders wage war against
other nation states to buffer their
citizens while in Nigeria our rulers
wage war against her citizens to buffer
up their cronies in the corruption-laden
policies of government activities. It
is only in a less fortunate nation –
like ours – will a sit in president
boldly say that he would rather face
mass upheaval than take an alternative
popular option of expunging the nation
of corruptive tendencies which has set
the nation back for half a century.
Elsewhere, the president would have
opted to resign in view of serious
opposition to his only way to tackle an
economic problem.
It
is also in our nation that a onetime
Communications mister who told the
masses that telephone – and by
extension, communication – was not for
the poor is rewarded with the third
political position in the land and he
occupying it it for two consecutive
times and may still hold it perpetually.
We have also witnessed a President who
once said that because we have not been
scavenging for food from the dustbin, we
should not count ourselves as poor move
about as a statesman. A onetime
Minister of power who boasted that
electricity would only stabilize in the
next fifty years was immediately
rewarded with the governorship of a
state and he is holding it for a second
term. It is only in Nigeria that
convicted criminal is welcomed with a
bang and funfair from the prison by the
biggest political party in Africa.
It
is, also, only in Nigeria that people
who created the economic and social
problems bedeviling the nation turn
around to threaten us of revolution as
if they are the owner of revolution. It
would seem that the whole essence of
governance is lost in the hands of this
group of people in power position in our
country.
I
have severally said that our democracy
defies the tenets of democracy
elsewhere. In our clime, none
performing political or elected office
holders are further rewarded with bigger
offices whereas in a well constituted
democracy, none performing office
holders are booted out if they fail to
do the right thing at the right time
which is to quickly resign their
appointive or elected positions at the
slightest of opposition or falling
public opinion ranking.
As
smart as CBN governor is, and as an
erudite in western education as he may
be, it is still evident that he is not a
naturally intelligent person. But he is
even miles away from most of his
counterparts in the helm of affairs in
the Nigerian government. His argument
as well as that of Dr. Okonjo-Iweala,
and their likes, on fuel subsidy removal
has further revealed the difference
between natural intelligence and western
education. None of these people in
government has been able to counter the
expose of Dr. Izielen Agbon with
superior facts and figures. What we
have seen all along is a casual wave
aside of the real issues in the
argument.
Why
has subsidy jumped from below 420
billion to over 1 trillion in the last
12 months that President Jonathan came
to power when we have not suddenly shot
up in our population or any associated
increase in domestic manufacturing or
rise in our GDP that would have
translated to better living? Why has
the executive and legislative expenses
tripled in the last few months without
any meaningful increase in
infrastructural development to show for
it?
Why
are the executive and the legislative
arms of government not thinking of
reducing their excess take away funds in
the face of starvation in the land if
only to demonstrate that they too can
make sacrifices. Why are we not
spreading the subsidy removal over
several years – assuming there is even
any subsidy at all in view of Dr.
Izielen Agbon’s expose – so that they
can come up with any palliative before
throwing this country into war?
Why
is the government afraid of combating
the so called cabal and why are we not
thinking of cleaning up all the
inefficiencies along the line of fuel
importation that has jacked up the fuel
pump price. What is the effort made to
bring the people who sunk large sums of
fund into turn around maintenance while
our refineries are not producing at even
50% of installed capacity? Why is
President Jonathan, Malam Sanusi Lamido
Sanusi, Dr. Okonjo-Iweala , et al not
resigning their jobs in view of the
strong opposition and their inability to
establish the true position on whatever
they call fuel subsidy? What effort have
they made to build new refineries?
Why
is it cheaper and easier to move fuel
pump price up more than a 100% in a
country where people are worth less than
$1.00 a day?
Nigeria, today, is under two types of
governments. One is the defector
government saddled by President Jonathan
and his cabinet while the other is
controlled by the dreaded Boko Haram
Islamist sect.
“These
acts of violence against innocent
citizens are unwarranted affront on our
collective safety and freedom, Nigerians
must stand as one to condemn them.”
The
above was the presidential
spokesperson’s reaction to the bombing
that took the lives of about 35 persons
in a church ground in Madala near Abuja.
But
in my kind opinion, the worst affront on
our collective safety is the inability
of a government to decidedly stand up
against a sect that is treating the very
existence of our nation.
Our
kind President was quick to add thus: “I
ask God, in His infinite mercies, to
grant these innocent souls eternal rest,
and give their families the fortitude to
bear this painful loss”.
Then
in an assurance that runs stale the
statement further declared: “I want
to reassure all Nigerians that
Government will not relent in its
determination to bring to justice all
the perpetrators of the acts of violence
and all others before now”. This is
how a government summarized the death of
more than two dozens of her citizens.
We
will all remember that this is making it
second consecutive killings, on
Christmas period, by this same sect.
Last year various bombings across the
country took lives of innocent
worshippers and here again it is
happening and what our President is
telling us is that Boko Haram will "not
be forever. It will end one day."
If this incident affected relatives of
these rulers last year and again this
year, will they be saying the same thing
or reacting the same way?
Is
it when a full sectarian war breaks out
that we will know that this is issue has
gone beyond rhetoric? It is amazing
that it cannot be said that this
government is on top of anything in this
country. From economy to security
through infrastructural development, the
story is the same. The only possible
thing that is happening in this country
is the sharing of the wealth of the
nation by those at the helm of affairs.
The moment their pockets are stuffed,
then there is no other issue that is
given serious attention.
When
one is worried about the inability of
this PDP central government to fish out
the so called cabal that is messing up
our oil supply sector, it is only a
concern that more serious issues could
become a destabilizing factor in our
country just as the issue of Boko Haram
is gradually turning out to be. If this
government can no longer perform the
primary roles of a government, is it not
time it voluntarily relinquish power so
that a more proactive set of people will
get in and find a lasting solution to
all these pockets of violence
threatening the existence of our
country. Must President Goodluck
Jonathan be the president at all cost
even when it is glaring that he has not
got what is takes to steer the affairs
of a country as large as Nigeria?
A
responsible government will know that
the circumstances that led to the
invasion of Odi town in Bayelsa state in
November 20 1999 has been surpassed
several times over by this issue of Boko
Haram and other security threats in our
country. The circumstances that led to
the civil war has also been rubbished by
this Islamist sect wanton destruction of
lives and properties across the northern
and central states and Abuja.
The
question is “why is government slow at
coming to a decision on what would be
done to unravel the control centre of
this group?”. Should we wait until the
people take up the challenge in what
would become a religious war? What is
the essence of governance in the first
place?
And
as if all these instability is not
enough to rock the nation out of
existence, a President unilaterally
dashed Nigerians a New Year gift of
“breathe of fresh air and
transformation” with a vexed issue which
even a mad man knows what the outcome
would be. The same President who was
taunting us with revolution in the next
four to five years is trying out a
laboratory version of revolution.
What
is happening now takes me back to the
issue of subjecting our leaders to
psychiatric checkup before assumption of
office as enunciated by Chief Obasanjo
after he was foisted on us as a
president in 1999. My modification to
this advice of Engr. Obasanjo is that
even past presidents who speak of
possibility of Arab spring here should
also be made to visit the psychiatrist.
In addition ministers, national assembly
members and state Governors and every
other person in corridors of power
should be subjected to psychiatric test
before assumption of office and
intermittently thereafter. It seems as
if something begins to brew in the heads
of our rulers as soon as they start
getting unexpected share of our national
wealth.
After all there is this saying, in Igbo
land, that a man who never dreamt of
being a title holder will invariably
push his insignia of the title well
above the normal wrist position up to
his shoulder. Most people who find
themselves in corridors of power in
Nigeria have no business being there in
the first place and as soon as they get
there, they get crazy and this begins to
manifest in their behavior and
utterances. They usually do not have
any idea of what their contribution to
humanity – through their position – is
beyond sharing the national wealth and
when you point this out to them, they
turn round to say that that is the cost
of leadership.
Chris Onyishi (ctekchris@yahoo.com)
Lagos, Nigeria.